ALCOHOL
ABUSE BEFORE
& AFTER MILITARY DEPLOYMENT
There are sentinel differences between the
war in
Coming of age in the post-Vietnam War,
post-draft Army, I was both a witness to and a participant in the then-reviled
uniformed services’ gradual reform and rehabilitation. But it was the
ascent of the Powell Doctrine, as espoused by then General Colin Powell, that
clarified the US Army’s proper mission and role in expeditionary combat
operations. The Powell Doctrine was first implemented as the
The essence of the Powell Doctrine can be
distilled into just a few geopolitical strategic imperatives: military
action should only be considered in situations of vital national interest and
should have a clear and attainable objective, and then only after all
non-military options have been exhausted. Moreover, a plausible exit
strategy should be clear, and the American people, if not the international community,
should be supportive of any such military intervention.
Following the successful application of
the Powell Doctrine to the brief and startlingly successful 1990-1991 “Gulf War
I,” the rehabilitation of the post-Vietnam War armed forces had become essentially
complete, nearly a generation after the
In contrast to the Vietnam War, the
current war in
Another important contrast between the two
conflicts has been the public’s disposition towards soldiers returning home
from war. Although servicemen and servicewomen from both wars were only following
the orders of their superior officers and elected politicians, military
personnel returning from the current conflicts have not had to bear open
displays of contempt from civilian society, unlike their Vietnam War
counterparts.
But war is, indeed, hell, and there is
ample clinical data from every recorded conflict in human history confirming
that increasing exposure to the horrors of war leads, inevitably, to increasing
risks of subsequent mental illness and substance abuse. Certainly, the
current and ongoing conflicts in
A new clinical research study, recently
published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, reports on
the incidence and severity of alcohol abuse among members of the armed forces
both before and following deployment to combat zones since 2000. A
notable feature of this clinical research study is that its authors are,
themselves, members of several military and veterans’ hospitals here in the
The “Millennium Cohort Study,” which is
funded by the Department of Defense, is the largest long-term prospective
healthcare study in military history, and currently includes nearly 150,000
participants. In this alcohol abuse sub-study, 48,481 participants
completed confidential pre-deployment and post-deployment health
questionnaires. Active Duty military members accounted for 26,613 of the
participants, while the remaining 21,868 participants were members of the
Reserve and National Guard forces. When broken down further, more than
5,000 of the study participants had been deployed to combat units, while a
nearly equal number of participants had been deployed but were not exposed to
combat operations. Finally, more than 37,000 of this study’s participants
were not deployed at all during the study.
Among the Reserve and National Guard
troops who admitted to the consumption of alcohol prior to deploying into
combat conditions, the prevalence of pre-deployment and post-deployment heavy
weekly drinking was 9% and 13%, respectively, while the prevalence of
binge-drinking was 53% and 53%, respectively, and the prevalence of social or
legal problems related to alcohol use was 15% and 12%, respectively. More
concerning were the Reserve and National Guard soldiers who deployed to combat
units, and who indicated minimal alcohol use, or no alcohol intake at all,
prior to being deployed. When these
soldiers were again surveyed after
their deployments, they reported a 9% prevalence of new-onset heavy weekly
drinking, a 26% prevalence of new-onset binge-drinking, and a 7% prevalence of new-onset
alcohol-related personal, social or legal problems. (The prevalence of
new-onset alcohol abuse among Active Duty soldiers, following deployment to
combat zones, was similar to that of their Reserve and National Guard
brethren.)
When the study’s researchers further analyzed
this self-reported data, they determined that the Reserve and National Guard
soldiers who were deployed to combat zones had nearly twice the risk of becoming involved with
new-onset heavy weekly drinking, binge-drinking, and alcohol-related troubles
in their personal and professional lives when compared to their non-deployed
fellow soldiers. Not surprisingly, the youngest soldiers were at the
highest risk of newly engaging in these risky alcohol-related behaviors
following combat deployments.
This study, which concentrated on the
alcohol-related behaviors of Reserve and National Guard soldiers before and
following combat zone deployments, found an alarming rise in new-onset alcohol
abuse among this cohort of part-time military reservists and
“citizen-soldiers,” particularly among younger soldiers. Ultimately, with
the exception of those who have paid the Ultimate Price, all of these deployed
Active Duty, Reserve and National Guard soldiers will eventually return to
civilian society and, based upon the results of this study, many of their lives
will already have become ravaged by alcohol abuse, and other substance abuse,
by the time they complete their military service. Chronic alcohol and
drug abuse have long been known to be associated with an increased risk of
divorce, unemployment, physical
and mental illness, and criminal behavior. Unless more can be done to
effectively (and preferably) preempt alcohol and substance abuse within the
uniformed services, and to implement a more robust counseling and treatment
program for military personnel and veterans who are already suffering from
combat-related alcohol and substance abuse, our society is very likely now looking
at the early phase of a large-scale epidemic of alcoholism and other substance
abuse among the thousands of veterans who are returning from combat
deployments, and who are returning to civilian life.
The Veterans Administration, which is
already reeling from its current burgeoning caseload of physically and
psychologically wounded veterans from the ongoing wars in Iraq and Afghanistan,
is unlikely to be able to cope adequately with the alcohol-related health and
social problems of the many thousands of soldiers who are continuing to
transition to civilian life. A national public health epidemic of combat-related alcohol and drug abuse is
likely to follow in the aftermath of the two ongoing wars, much as was seen
following the
Many
of us who are following
the ongoing Olympic games in
Disclaimer:
As always, my advice to readers is to seek the advice of your physician
before making any significant changes in
medications, diet, or level of physical activity.
Dr. Wascher is an oncologic surgeon, professor of surgery, a widely published author, and the Director of the Division of Surgical Oncology at Newark Beth Israel Medical Center
http://www.sbhcs.com/hospitals/newark_beth_israel/mservices/oncology/surgical.html
Send your feedback to Dr. Wascher at
rwascher@doctorwascher.net
Links to Other Health & Wellness Sites
Copyright 2008. Robert A. Wascher, MD, FACS. All rights reserved.
Dr. Wascher's Archives:
3-16-2008: Benefits
of a Full Drug Coverage Plan for Medicare Patients?; Parent-Teen
Conversations about Sex; Soy (Genistein) & Prostate Cancer
2-23-2008: Universal
Healthcare Insurance Study; Glucosamine & Arthritis
2-3-2008: Vitamin D
& Cardiovascular Health; Vitamin D & Breast Cancer;
Green Tea & Colorectal Cancer
1-12-2008: Statins,
Diabetes & Stroke and Obesity; GERD & Esophageal Cancer
12-31-2007: Minority Women, Hormone Replacement Therapy
& Breast Cancer; Does Health Insurance Improve Health?