The
information in this column is intended for informational
purposes only, and does not constitute medical advice or
recommendations by the author. Please consult with your
physician before making any lifestyle or medication changes, or if you
have any other concerns regarding your health.
SECONDHAND
SMOKE &
HEART ATTACK RISK
In
one of the most important
public health research studies published in 2008, the Centers for
Disease
Control published an update of the Pueblo Heart Study on December 30th. This epidemiological study
was performed,
prospectively, over a 3-year period between 2002 and 2004 in Pueblo,
Colorado. During the second half of
this study, Pueblo
enacted stringent
legislation to eliminate smoking in public places.
The incidence of admissions to hospitals for
heart attack in the Pueblo area were monitored throughout the course of
this
study, both before and after the smoking ban was initiated.
Although
there is abundant
evidence linking chronic smoking with heart and lung disease, and with
multiple
types of cancer (including lung cancer, the #1 cause of cancer death in
the United
States,
and throughout much of the world), most of these diseases arise after
several
years of smoking. However,
recent
research has shown us that many deleterious health effects associated
with
smoking occur almost instantaneously.
These rapid-onset effects of smoking include an increase
in blood clot
formation (increased coagulability) and a loss in the normal ability of
blood
vessels to dilate when increased blood flow is required within vital
organs,
including the heart. Smoking
also drives
up carbon monoxide levels in the blood, which prevents oxygen-carrying
red
blood cells from picking up and delivering life-sustaining oxygen. (These adverse health
effects are known to
occur within 30 minutes of lighting up.)
Moreover, these same acute-onset smoking-associated
adverse health effects
have been documented not only in smokers, but in nonsmoking bystanders
who are
exposed to secondhand smoke, as well.
There
are a couple of factors
that make this public health study so powerful, including its
prospective
design, and the fact that the entire population of the Pueblo area was
assessed
for changes in the incidence of heart attack following the
implementation of a
new ban on smoking in public places.
Also,
the heart attack admission rates for two adjacent communities without
public
smoking bans, including the much larger Colorado Springs
area, added an important set of controls that
have not been included in similar previous studies.
In
the initial report of the
results of this study, in November of 2005, the Pueblo Health Study
researchers
identified a 27 percent reduction in the number of admissions to
Pueblo-area
hospitals for heart attack during the second half of the original
3-year study,
after the smoking ban had been enacted.
(In the 18 months before
the
smoking ban went into effect, there were 399 heart attack patients
admitted. During
the second 18 months,
there were only 291 heart attack admissions to the same hospitals.) The Centers for Disease
Control update
extends the initial 3-year results from the Pueblo Heart study through
June
2006, thus adding an additional 18 months of follow-up data.
The
updated data from this
study reveals a striking cumulative reduction in the number of hospital
admissions for heart attacks. When
compared to the number of heart attack admissions that occurred prior
to the
enactment of the public smoking ban, there was an incredible 41 percent
reduction in such admissions noted during the additional 18 months of
follow-up
data. Thus, within
3 years of
implementing a public smoking ban, the number of heart attacks in
Pueblo dropped,
amazingly enough, by nearly one-half.
At
the same time, similar data collected from two surrounding communities without a public smoking ban showed no
significant changes in heart attack admissions during the same
timeframe.
I
should note that, while this
study did not separate smokers from nonsmokers, previous studies have
shown
that susceptible nonsmokers appear to be at an especially high risk of
experiencing heart attacks due to exposure to secondhand smoke. (Other less comprehensive
studies have also
shown, as the Pueblo Heart Study did, that smoking bans quickly result
in rapid
declines in heart attack admissions.)
As
with previous and similar
studies, the beneficial effects of public smoking bans appear to be
related to
at least two factors. First,
nonsmokers
are spared exposure to the acutely toxic cardiovascular and lung
effects of
secondhand smoke. Secondly,
strict
public smoking bans have been shown not only to decrease smoking
behaviors
among smokers, but to also improve quitting rates among smokers.
While
the Pueblo Heart Study
is subject to the same limitations as other so-called observational
studies,
and other undetected factors may have also, therefore, contributed to
the
dramatic decline in heart attacks after the smoking ban was
implemented, this
study joins 8 previous and similar studies that also identified a
significant
reduction in heart attacks after public smoking bans were enacted. Taken together, these 9
studies strongly
suggest that the dangers of secondhand smoke may be far greater than
public
health experts have previously believed.
(According to the Centers for Disease Control, exposure to
secondhand
smoker causes at least 46,000 deaths due to heart disease every year,
as well
as 3,000 or more lung cancer deaths among nonsmokers each year.)
Based
upon more than five
decades of scientific data linking tobacco smoke with cancer, chronic
lung
disease, and cardiovascular disease, it still amazes me that there are
so many
communities that still permit smoking in public places, or that have
enacted
hopelessly anemic limitations on the ability of smokers to subject the
80
percent of the U.S. population that does not smoke to highly toxic
secondhand tobacco
smoke. An estimated
500,000 people die
every year in the United States,
alone, from completely preventable tobacco-associated
diseases. This
updated data from the
Pueblo Heart Study should galvanize public health advocates and
agencies, and
government leaders, to better protect the public from unwanted exposure
to
tobacco smoke.
POOR
PHYSICAL FITNESS DURING CHILDHOOD & HEART DISEASE RISK DURING
ADULTHOOD
An interesting very long-term
prospective clinical study from Norway
has been following more than 1,000 volunteers who first entered the
study, in
1979, as children (the Oslo Youth Study).
In this study, which has just been published in the
journal Pediatrics, all of the
study’s
volunteers were assessed for cardiovascular disease factors upon
entering into
the study at an average age of 13 years.
Subsequently, the volunteers were reassessed at an average
age of 15,
25, 33 and 44 years. The
findings of
this study are rather intriguing given the worsening epidemic of
decreased
physical activity and obesity among children in many countries
throughout the
world, including the United States.
Early
on in this study, lower
levels of physical fitness among the child volunteers were associated
with an
increased likelihood of obesity and increased blood pressure, which are
known
cardiovascular disease risk factors.
However, as the children matured into adults, the impact
of their
previous childhood physical fitness levels upon known cardiovascular
disease
factors diminished with advancing age.
By age 40, there was no longer any correlation between the
level of
physical fitness and physical activity that was present at 13 years of
age and
the presence or absence of cardiovascular disease factors in adulthood.
I
do not want to send the
wrong message here by quoting the results of this epidemiological
study, but I
do believe that there is a positive message here as long as one does
not
over-interpret the results of this research study (as with all
observational
studies, there are many potential sources of bias that can skew either
the
results of such studies, or the interpretation of their results). There is no question but
that physically
inactive children are at increased risk of becoming obese, or that
obese
children have a higher risk of the same diseases that plague obese
adults. (These
obesity-associated illnesses include
arthritis, high blood pressure, lung disease, cardiovascular disease,
diabetes,
and cancer.) But
what this study seems
to suggest is that adverse cardiovascular risk factors associated with
poor
levels of physical fitness during childhood can be reversed by middle
age. While this
study leaves many unanswered
questions, it does offer some reassurance that physically inactive and
unfit
children can still grow into otherwise healthy adults, presumably
because they
adopt healthier lifestyles that, over time, nullify the effects of
childhood
physical inactivity, including childhood obesity and hypertension.
Share:
Disclaimer:
As always, my advice to readers is to seek the advice of your physician
before making any significant changes
in
medications, diet, or level of physical activity.